Fuddland

Skip to site navigation

Relative links:

Smashing

One broken bowl

The set of crockery originally consisted of four dinner plates, four side plates, four bowls, and four mugs, all matching. I have broken one dinner plate [some time ago] and now one bowl. So the question is: do I just have some fun and intentionally smash a side plate and a mug, so that it’s now sets of three?

In: Moblog

2005 / 05 / 27 – 19:19

Relative links:


Comments [add yours]

#1

Mark | 2005 / 05 / 28 – 09:01

Hold a competition to come up with the most inventive way to break the other items and then photograph the results.

#2

David | 2005 / 05 / 28 – 11:07

Re #2: First I tried Secret Option [c]—mending the bowl with SuperGlue. But the fix wasn’t watertight, so now I’ll have to break it again.

#3

clair | 2005 / 05 / 28 – 11:25

This could be a good opportunity to take up plate spinning.

#4

Phil | 2005 / 05 / 29 – 15:16

You can’t have a set of 3, it’s an odd number. Clearly your only solution is to break stuff until you end up with 2 of each item.

#5

stacey | 2005 / 05 / 31 – 01:36

awww, D. i always loved that set. and trying to super-glue broken things in your kitchen. pffftt. : )

#6

David | 2005 / 05 / 31 – 19:34

Re #5: We had slightly more SuperGluing success with the fridge doorhandle which someone wrenched from its fittings. :P

 

Post a comment

User Information




Sorry, your user information does not appear to be stored. Please enter it in the boxes provided.

If this is your first time commenting here, you might want to read the commenting policy.


Allowed HTML:

  • <a>,
  • <abbr>,
  • <acronym>,
  • <b>,
  • <blockquote>,
  • <br>,
  • <code>,
  • <del>,
  • <em>,
  • <i>,
  • <ins>,
  • <p>,
  • <small>,
  • <span>,
  • <strong>,
  • <sub>,
  • <sup>,
  • <tt>