Fuddland

Skip to site navigation

About a year ago, I was praising Amazon’s “Recommendations” engine for finding me several excellent musicians, and today I was selected to be one of a hundred people chosen to preview LOVEFiLM’s own version of this idea.

Every time you rent a DVD from LOVEFiLM, you’re asked to give it a rating from 1 [unwatchable] to 7 [loved it]. It used to be out of 5, but recently they switched to out-of-7, presumably using the highly complex mathematical technique of rounding to adjust the old scores.

Two recommended DVDs, showing a brief description of the disc, and options to rate it, find similar discs or remove it from the list

Now it’s become apparent what these ratings are used for: along with other factors [such as “people who rented this disc also rented these…”], a list of recommendations is generated for you to make easy selections of DVDs you might not have thought of or come across otherwise.

The three sub-options when asking for a disc not to be recommended again

Somehow, the engine feels more “natural” than Amazon’s; if you choose to just add a rating to one or more of the recommendations, the list gets more refined to your tastes. If you choose the [clumsily-worded, I wonder if it’s a typo?] option “Don’t recommendation this again”, you get three choices:

  1. Seen it already: rate it and it’s removed from the list.

  2. Don’t like this type of thing: disc is removed and related discs are not recommended.

  3. Just don’t like this one: only this disc is removed, recommendations unaffected.

See, I knew there was a reason to fastidiously rate each movie I rented. Seems like I need to do a bit of refining though: for some baffling reason it’s recommended “125 Great Everton Premiership Goals”! I clicked the “Why was this recommended?” link, which is supposed to list the discs that I’ve already rated which produced this match, but it came up with no matches — I’ve rented nothing that even mentions football. No matter though, just a quick click on option 2 of the three choices above and I shouldn’t see any more of its ilk in my list again.


Link now says 'Don't recommend this again'

Update: It was a typo!

In: Movie News

2004 / 10 / 08 – 22:07

Relative links:


Comments

#1

mrtn | 2004 / 10 / 11 – 13:53

hate to be predictable, but there’s another obvious typo in your post:

“125 great everton premiership goals” - yeh, right…

(flame-proof suit on)

#2

Daisy | 2004 / 10 / 12 – 19:12

*snigger*

 

Commenting Closed

Commenting on this post is closed. Thanks to all those who left comments. If you'd still like to say something about this entry, feel free to email me.